U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1993

Romberg v. Nichols

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 8, 1993 · Scannlain, Thompson, Wallace

993 F.2d 1453 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants., Keith A. Fink, Cotkin & Collins, Los Ange-les, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Michael Romberg Debra Romberg v. Robert Nichols Dennis Lazzari Hugh Lloyd Benito Jurado Thomas Laing (9th Cir. 1995)
Romberg v. Nichols (9th Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1038, 122 L.Ed.2d 348 we vacate the award of attorneys’ fees and remand this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for reconsideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.