Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin

Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 27, 1994 · Browning, Kozinski, Rymer
15 F.3d 145; 94 Daily Journal DAR 1055; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 610; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1290; 1994 WL 19156 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Stephen Madison, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ira Reiner, Dist. Atty., Office of County Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees., Johnny Ray Mahon, in pro. per. for plaintiff-appellant.

Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The judgment of this court 1 having been vacated by the Supreme Court, 114 S.Ct. 539, 126 L.Ed.2d 441, this case is hereby remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2167, 124 L.Ed.2d 391 (1993).

REMANDED.

1

. The April 12, 1993 judgment inaccurately stated that only Judges Browning and Rymer participated in the decision. The judgment should have stated that Judges Browning, Kozinski and Rymer participated in the decision.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.