U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

Jaime Portillo v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, United States of America, Real Party in Interest

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 19, 1994 · Schroeder, Nelson, Thompson

15 F.3d 819; 94 Daily Journal DAR 712; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 529; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1203; 1994 WL 17169 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Deborah M. Fine and John R. Hannah, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner., Charles F. Hyder and Roslyn Moore-Silver, Assistant United States Attorneys, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent and Real Party in Interest.

Cases that cite this one

20 later published cases cite this decision. The 18 that cite it most often are listed here.

United States v. Raymond Lee Scott (9th Cir. 2006)
United States v. Raymond Lee Scott (9th Cir. 2005)
United States v. Scott (9th Cir. 2006)
United States v. Scott (9th Cir. 2005)
Vore v. United States Department of Justice (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2003)
Moulé Ex Rel. Moulé v. Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69 (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1994)
Hurst-Castl v. Long Term Capital Partnership VI, LLC (District Court, D. Nevada 2025)
In re: John Kirkland v. Usbc, Los Angeles (9th Cir. 2023)
Fierros v. McAleenan (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
State of Tennessee v. Bruce Warren Scarborogh (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005)
State v. Smith (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004)
State of Arizona v. Tony Dewayne Smith (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004)
Ellis v. City of San Diego (9th Cir. 1999)
Calderon v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (9th Cir. 1998)
United States v. Barry v. Preston (9th Cir. 1996)
Rise v. State of Oregon (9th Cir. 1995)
In the Matter of Phillip R. Balsimo and Jamie Hunter (7th Cir. 1995)
Rise v. Oregon (9th Cir. 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Concurring Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.