U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

Casual Lamps of California, Inc. v. James Young, Individually and Dba Ultimate Manufacturing

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 11, 1994

17 F.3d 393; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9270; 1994 WL 41165 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

17 F.3d 393

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
CASUAL LAMPS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James YOUNG, individually and dba Ultimate Manufacturing,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-55943.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 2, 1994.*
Decided Feb. 11, 1994.

Before: BROWNING, FERGUSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The district court's finding of fact that the lamps are not substantially similar in both idea and expression and that the shapes thereof are common is not clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.