Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

Hoppel v. Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska, Inc.

Hoppel v. Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 23, 1994
17 F.3d 394; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9311; 1994 WL 55551 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Hoppel v. Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska, Inc.

Opinion

17 F.3d 394

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Olaree E. HOPPEL, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
BLUE CROSS OF WASHINGTON AND ALASKA, INC.; Blue Cross of
Washington and Alaska Supplemental Retirement Program; Blue
Cross of Washington and Alaska Deferred Income Plan; Robert
Richmond, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-36761.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1994.
Decided Feb. 23, 1994.

1

Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT ORDER

2

The judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court. See Order on Motions for Summary Judgment, ER at 55.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑