Ambrose v. Vodney
Ambrose v. Vodney
Opinion
19 F.3d 25
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Charles J. AMBROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.P. VODNEY; Michael Byrd; G.C. Clogston; John O.
Perkins; John Conley, constituting the
Administrative Committee of the Hanford
Operations and Engineering
Pension Plan,
Defendants-
Appellees.
No. 92-36795.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1994.
Decided March 8, 1994.
Before: REAVLEY,* SKOPIL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
The judgment of the district court is affirmed and attorney's fees are denied Ambrose, all for the reasons stated in Watkins v. Westinghouse Hanford Co., --- F.3d ----, Nos. 91-36195, 91-36233, slip op. 14589 (9th Cir. Dec. 29, 1993).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charles J. Ambrose v. E.P. Vodney Michael Byrd G.C. Clogston John O. Perkins John Conley, Constituting the Administrative Committee of the Hanford Operations and Engineering Pension Plan, Defendants
- Status
- Unpublished