Mattie Holland Dan Holland v. Daren Roeser City of Portland
Mattie Holland Dan Holland v. Daren Roeser City of Portland
22 F.3d 947; 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1151; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2894; 94 Daily Journal DAR 5536; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8697; 1994 WL 145102
(Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Wonderful Nurseries LLC v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2025)
- (SS) Fertig v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2024)
- Teresa Munguia v. Andrew Saul (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2021)
- Kommavongsa v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2021)
- Cherry v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2021)
- David Lee Clancy v. Nancy A. Berryhill (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2020)
- Manlove v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2020)
- Grove v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2020)
- Adrianos v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2020)
- Clow v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2020)
- Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2020)
- (SS) Winkler v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2019)
- Frack v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
22 F.3d 947w
Mattie HOLLAND; Dan Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Daren ROESER; City of Portland, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 92-35536.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 4, 1994.
Decided April 26, 1994.
1
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 22 F.3D.949.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.