Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

Jane Ellen Benson v. Central California Women's Facility, Warden

Jane Ellen Benson v. Central California Women's Facility, Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 29, 1994
24 F.3d 244; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19055; 1994 WL 161637 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Jane Ellen Benson v. Central California Women's Facility, Warden

Opinion

24 F.3d 244
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Jane Ellen BENSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMEN'S FACILITY, WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-15524.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 14, 1994.*
Decided April 29, 1994.

Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON AND CANBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

We affirm the judgment of the district court and deny petitioner's motion to enlarge the record.

2

Petitioner may file another habeas corpus petition in the district court and may make a timely motion to enlarge the record at the district court. To prevail on a motion to enlarge the record, Petitioner will have to show cause and prejudice for failing to bring the newly discovered evidence forward earlier.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*

The panel unanimously find this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑