U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

In re Hurt

In re Hurt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 12, 1994
24 F.3d 246; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19007; 1994 WL 183396 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

In re Hurt

Opinion

24 F.3d 246
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re Norma J. HURT, Debtor.
SUNWAY SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant,
v.
Milton G. PACE; Kachina Plywood, Inc.; Intermountain Wood
Products, Inc.; Robertson Wood Products, Inc.; Zeco, Inc.;
Nevada-West Systems, Inc.; Canco, Inc.; Perco, Inc.;
Norma J. Hurt, Appellees.

No. 93-16515.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 12, 1994.
Decided May 12, 1994.

1

Before: SKOPIL, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges

2

ORDER*

3

Milton Pace's motion to allow filing of "Supplement To: Appellee's Brief" is denied.

4

The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel judgment, including sanctions, is affirmed for the reasons stated in its Memorandum Decision filed June 29, 1993.

5

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.