Gary W. Dash v. United States
Cases that cite this one
26 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- In re: Leslie Klein (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2025)
- Siegel v. Boston (In re Sale Guaranty Corp.) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 1998)
- Hopkins v. Martinez (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho 2022)
- Taxel v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. (In re Deuel) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2006)
- Ralph Bouma v. Anita White (9th Cir. 1994)
- McDowell v. United States (9th Cir. 1994)
- Kurt S. Stricklen v. Federal Aviation Administration, Kurt S. Stricklen v. Federal Aviation Administration National Transportation Safety Board (9th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Joseph A. Elenteny (9th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. John M. Coughlan, Sr. (9th Cir. 1994)
- In re Lance E. Thomas, Debtor. Eva M. Huber, Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellant v. Curtis B. Danning, Trustee, Defendant/counter-Plaintiff/appellee (9th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Michael W. Chew (9th Cir. 1994)
- Donald Larry Cameron v. United States of America (9th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Enrique Carmargo, United States of America v. Carlos Arturo Quijano (9th Cir. 1994)
- Norris D. Sanders v. Barry Delevan, Police Officer James M. Beene, and Blanch Cane (9th Cir. 1994)
- Wahid Y. Sartawi v. Al Gomez (9th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Carlos Dolores-Rodriguez (9th Cir. 1994)
- Rux v. Sarvis (9th Cir. 1994)
- Darrell Cherry v. Robert Wright, Superintendent (9th Cir. 1994)
- Cecil R. Tedder v. Eddie S. Ylst, Warden (9th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Salvador Castillo-Lara (9th Cir. 1994)
- In re Gordon Wayne Jenkins Jolene Jenkins, Debtor. First Interstate Bank of Idaho v. Gordon Wayne Jenkins (1st Cir. 1994)
- Jesus Sanchez-Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jesus Sanchez-Sanchez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (9th Cir. 1994)
- Percy Lavae Bacon v. James Gomez (9th Cir. 1994)
- Carlos A. Gurry v. D. States (9th Cir. 1994)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
32 F.3d 572
Gary W. DASH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-35407.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 3, 1994.*
Decided Aug. 15, 1994.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Gary Walter Dash appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. He contends that his sentence should be vacated because (1) the district court incorrectly advised him at the change of plea hearing that his special parole term would be two years and (2) the reporter's transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings were lost. We review the legal issues presented in a Sec. 2255 petition de novo and the underlying factual findings for clear error. United States v. Roberts, 5 F.3d 365, 368 (9th Cir. 1993). Because a Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 claim must be resolved by looking exclusively to the proceeding in question, the district court erred by relying on the 1979 plea proceeding and the August 30, 1983 letter. See, e.g., United States v. Gastelum, 16 F.3d 996, 998-99 (9th Cir. 1994) (Rule 11 "ensures that a defendant is fully aware of his rights when his plea is entered--that he is aware of them at the time they are being waived. Earlier or later knowledge is insufficient to provide that assurance."). In all other respects, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion, which fully and fairly addressed Dash's claims.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.