U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

Michael L. Rice and Billie M. Rice v. United States

Michael L. Rice and Billie M. Rice v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 7, 1994
35 F.3d 571; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 32351; 1994 WL 481978 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Michael L. Rice and Billie M. Rice v. United States

Opinion

35 F.3d 571

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Michael L. RICE and Billie M. Rice, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-16272.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 1994.*
Decided Sept. 7, 1994.

Before: GOODWIN, FERGUSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Schmitz v. Commissioner, No. 93-70960, the judgment of the district court is

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.