Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1994

Brenda G. Mack v. Nordstrom, Inc., a Washington Corporation

Brenda G. Mack v. Nordstrom, Inc., a Washington Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 19, 1994
38 F.3d 1218; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29403; 1994 WL 574152 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Brenda G. Mack v. Nordstrom, Inc., a Washington Corporation

Opinion

38 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Brenda G. MACK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NORDSTROM, INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-35718.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 3, 1994.*
Decided Oct. 19, 1994.

Before: LAY,** TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

1

ORDER***

2

After full consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record in the District Court, the judgment entered June 29, 1993, is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the District Court's order entered June 29, 1993.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑