U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1995

Woodbridge v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 14, 1995

47 F.3d 1177; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19400; 1995 WL 62746 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

47 F.3d 1177

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Allen WOODBRIDGE; Lori Tezak, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Benjamin Wai Silva; "Jane Doe"
Silva, husband and wife, and the marital community composed
thereof; Larry Craig; Pierce County, a political
subdivision Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-35821.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 1995.*
Decided Feb. 14, 1995.

Before: SKOPIL, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

For the reasons stated by the district court we AFFIRM.

This panel unanimously agrees that this case is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.