U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1995

Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz

Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 16, 1995
56 F.3d 71; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19856 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz

Opinion

56 F.3d 71w
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Douglas G. HOUSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rodney HAGEMAN; Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L.
White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-15421.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.