United States v. Porter Wayland Mickle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Porter Wayland Mickle, 67 F.3d 310 (9th Cir. 1995)
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33049; 1995 WL 571526

United States v. Porter Wayland Mickle

Opinion

67 F.3d 310

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Porter Wayland MICKLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-15470.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 18, 1995.*
Decided Sept. 27, 1995.

Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Former federal prisoner Porter Wayland Mickle appeals pro se the district court's denial of his second 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed February 21, 1995.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Reference

Status
Unpublished