Novaplex, Inc., Dba Gage Systems Group v. City of Los Angeles Daniel Lungren, Attorney General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 28, 1995

Novaplex, Inc., Dba Gage Systems Group v. City of Los Angeles Daniel Lungren, Attorney General, 77 F.3d 489 (9th Cir. 1995)

1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40966; 1995 WL 765136

Opinion

77 F.3d 489

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
NOVAPLEX, INC., dba Gage Systems Group, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Daniel Lungren, Attorney General,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-56005.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1995.
Decided Dec. 28, 1995.

Before: HUG, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Because a state criminal prosecution was pending at the time the district court entered its summary judgment order, the district court's grant of summary judgment is VACATED and the suit is DISMISSED without prejudice. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971); Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332 (1974), overruled on other grounds, Mandel v. Bradley, 432 U.S. 173 (1977) (per curiam).

Reference

Status: Unpublished