Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 2, 1996

Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp., 72 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 1996)

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 50; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4; 1996 WL 1211

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellants Anthony Maniscalco and Michael Lea, members of a class action brought by Jack Cohen and other employees of Imperial Savings Association against the Resolution Trust Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss their appeals, including their pending petitions for rehearing and a suggestion for rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the appellants’ motion is granted. Fed.RApp.P. 42(b).

Under Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir. 1994), we vacate our opinion, 61 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 1995), and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with Blair.

APPEAL DISMISSED AND OPINION VACATED. CASE REMANDED TO DISTRICT COURT.

Reference

Full Case Name: Jack COHEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Anthony Maniscalco, II v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an insured depository institution, a.k.a. Imperial Federal Savings Association, Defendant-Appellee Jack COHEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Mark Rozells, and Michael Lea v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an insured depository institution, a.k.a. Imperial Federal Savings Association
Status: Published