Flynn v. Ballinger

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Flynn v. Ballinger, 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1996)
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7166; 1996 WL 19186

Flynn v. Ballinger

Opinion

76 F.3d 386

19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2759

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Edward J. FLYNN, II, individually and on behalf of the
Edward J. Flynn, II Individual Retirement Account and Edwin
L. Griffith, Jr., individually and on behalf of the Edwin L.
Griffith Jr. Individual Retirement Account, Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
Douglas G. BALLINGER, Byron Geils, Ronald L. Hagenbaugh,
Michael J. John, Edward C. Roualdes, William S. Swindells,
and the Pacific Lithograph Company, Inc. Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, Defendants/Appellees.

No. 94-15907.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Jan. 18, 1996.

Before: NORRIS, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1

ORDER*

2

We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its order granting defendants' motion to dismiss (filed May 9, 1994).

3

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Reference

Full Case Name
Edward J. Flynn, Ii, Individually and on Behalf of the Edward J. Flynn, II Individual Retirement Account and Edwin L. Griffith, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of the Edwin L. Griffith Jr. Individual Retirement Account v. Douglas G. Ballinger, Byron Geils, Ronald L. Hagenbaugh, Michael J. John, Edward C. Roualdes, William S. Swindells, and the Pacific Lithograph Company, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Status
Unpublished