Jerome Montgomery v. M. Woods D. Craver D. Scotts

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 25, 1996

Jerome Montgomery v. M. Woods D. Craver D. Scotts, 76 F.3d 387 (9th Cir. 1996)

1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7333; 1996 WL 29265

Opinion

76 F.3d 387

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Jerome MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M. WOODS; D. Craver; D. Scotts, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-16640.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 1996.*
Decided Jan. 25, 1996.

Before: ALARCON, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

We affirm the district court's dismissal without prejudice of California state prisoner Jerome Montgomery's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in light of his failure to comply with the court's orders requiring him to provide proof of service and file a status report. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 321 (1992).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished