United States v. Manuel Ochoa, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 4, 1996

United States v. Manuel Ochoa, Jr., 78 F.3d 595 (9th Cir. 1996)

1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13696; 1996 WL 92143

Opinion

78 F.3d 595

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Manuel OCHOA, Jr. Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-10027.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 1996.*
Decided March 4, 1996.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Manuel Ochoa, Jr. appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished