Sam A. Barzilla, III v. United States Postal Service

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 18, 1996

Sam A. Barzilla, III v. United States Postal Service, 79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996)

1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17156; 1996 WL 119512

Opinion

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Sam A. BARZILLA, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-35519.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 1996.*
Decided March 18, 1996.

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Sam A. Barzilla, III appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against the United States Postal Service for failure to state a claim. We agree with the district court that Barzilla's claims are foreclosed by Pereira v. U.S. Postal Serv., 964 F.2d 873, 876 (9th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. All outstanding motions are denied as moot

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished