U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

Alfreda Richardson v. State of California

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 1, 1996

82 F.3d 423; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21596; 1996 WL 154419 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

82 F.3d 423

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Alfreda RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-16757.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 26, 1996.*
Decided April 1, 1996.

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on October 3, 1994. See Mason v. Genisco Tech. Corp., 960 F.2d 849, 852 (9th Cir. 1992); Townsel v. County of Contra Costa, 820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.