U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Jeanne Manarite

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 26, 1996

83 F.3d 429; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28578; 1996 WL 204563 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

83 F.3d 429

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jeanne MANARITE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-10367.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 1996.*
Decided April 26, 1996.

Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Jeanne Manarite appeals her sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following her conviction for money laundering, interstate transportation of stolen property, and receipt of stolen property, and following this court's remand for resentencing in her prior appeal, No. 93-10528. Her counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.