U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Michael Scott Leboss

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 15, 1996

91 F.3d 156; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36981; 1996 WL 393840 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

91 F.3d 156

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Scott LeBOSS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-36208.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1996.*
Decided July 15, 1996.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Michael LeBoss, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence for conspiring to distribute cocaine. LeBoss contends that the Double Jeopardy Clause barred his conviction due to the prior civil forfeiture of $2,033 in currency. This contention is precluded by the United States Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Ursery, No. 95-345, 1996 WL 340815 (U.S. June 24, 1996).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.