U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

Leobardo Espino-Ramirez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 31, 1996

92 F.3d 1192; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28151 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

92 F.3d 1192

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Leobardo ESPINO-RAMIREZ, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-70591.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 4, 1995.
Decided July 31, 1996.

Before: D.W. NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, WARE, District Judge1.

MEMORANDUM2

Leobardo Espino-Ramirez ("Petitioner") appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge's finding that he is deportable pursuant to INA § 1251(a)(11). On December 15, 1995, the Board of Immigration Appeals granted Petitioner's motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. Therefore, we no longer have jurisdiction over Petitioner's petition for review. See INA § 106(a), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(1). Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

The Honorable James Ware, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.