U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Joseph Allen, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 30, 1996

92 F.3d 1194; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28232; 1996 WL 426868 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

92 F.3d 1194

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph ALLEN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-50027.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 30, 1996.

Before: SCHROEDER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KING,* District Judge.

ORDER

The Supreme Court has vacated our decision affirming Allen's conviction and sentence, 56 F.3d 73 (9th Cir. 1995), and remanded for further consideration in light of Bailey v. U.S., 516 U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 501. See Allen v. U.S., No. 95-7356. The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for such proceedings as may be appropriate in light of Bailey. The mandate shall issue immediately.

Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.