U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Earl Hunwardsen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1996

94 F.3d 653; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37329; 1996 WL 468622 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

94 F.3d 653

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Earl HUNWARDSEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-10407.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 16, 1996.

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Earl Hunwardsen appeals his conviction by jury and ten-month sentence imposed for violations of federal tax laws. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hunwardsen's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.