U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Olga Sarabia

United States v. Olga Sarabia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1996
94 F.3d 654; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37273; 1996 WL 468601 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Olga Sarabia

Opinion

94 F.3d 654

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Olga SARABIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-10171.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 16, 1996.

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Olga Sarabia appeals her conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Her counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.