N.L. Management Company, Inc., a California Corporation v. County of Riverside
N.L. Management Company, Inc., a California Corporation v. County of Riverside
Opinion
95 F.3d 1158
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
N.L. MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a California Corporation,
Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Defendant/Appellee.
No. 96-55676.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 19, 1996.
Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER AND RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard by denying preliminary injunctive relief. See Topanga Press, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 989 F.2d 1524, 1527 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1537 (1994). The record before us shows that the court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise or abuse its discretion in concluding that appellant's showing of probable success on the merits was insufficient to warrant preliminary injunctive relief. See id. Accordingly, the denial of a preliminary injunction is
AFFIRMED.
The panel finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, appellant's request for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.