U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Darryl Storm, United States of America v. Michael Donnelly

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 8, 1996

95 F.3d 1160; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38471 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

95 F.3d 1160

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Darryl STORM, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael DONNELLY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 95-50437, 95-50438, 95-50454 and 95-95456.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 6, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 8, 1996.

Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER**

The district court's order dismissing the plaintiffs' double jeopardy claims is affirmed. See United States v. Ursery, 64 USLW 4565 (June 24, 1996).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Circuit Rule 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.Rule 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.