U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Jesse Lee Gregory

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 13, 1996

97 F.3d 1462; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40366; 1996 WL 528410 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

97 F.3d 1462

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jesse Lee GREGORY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-10392.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 10, 1996.*
Decided Sept. 13, 1996.

Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Jesse Lee Gregory appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Gregory's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.