U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Juvenile Male

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 11, 1996

98 F.3d 1347; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38617; 1996 WL 588512 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

98 F.3d 1347

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JUVENILE MALE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-10217.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 7, 1996.*
Decided Oct. 11, 1996.

Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

J.L.M., a juvenile male, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss an information charging him with an act of juvenile delinquency by possessing a handgun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(x)(2) and 924(a)(5)(A)(i). We affirm.

J.L.M. contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(x)(2) is unconstitutional because it exceeds Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Michael R., 90 F.3d 340, 345 (9th Cir. 1996), in which this court held that "enactment of section 922(x)(2) is a valid, constitutional exercise of Congressional commerce powers." To the extent that J.L.M. maintains that Michael R. was wrongly decided, we cannot reconsider or overrule the decision of a prior panel. See United States v. Gay, 967 F.2d 322, 327 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 929 (1992).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.