U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Oscar Jimenez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 11, 1996

98 F.3d 1347; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38611; 1996 WL 588465 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

98 F.3d 1347

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Oscar JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-10130.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 7, 1996.*
Decided Oct. 11, 1996.

Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Oscar Jimenez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Jimenez's attorney has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which this court has construed as including a motion to withdraw as counsel of record under Anders. Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.