U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Reed Barries, III

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 11, 1996

98 F.3d 1347; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38619; 1996 WL 588480 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

98 F.3d 1347

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Reed BARRIES, III, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-10416.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 7, 1996.*
Decided Oct. 11, 1996.

Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Reed Barries, III appeals his jury conviction for the crime of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) on the ground the statute is unconstitutional. This contention is foreclosed by this court's recent opinion in United States v. Polanco, 93 F.3d 555, 563 (9th Cir. 1996), rejecting an identical challenge under United States v. Hanna, 55 F.3d 1456 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.