In re GPA, Inc.
In re GPA, Inc.
Opinion
103 F.3d 138
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re GPA, INC. d/b/a General Practice Associates, Debtor.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC., a Nevada corporation;
Alfred De Florentis, Audrey De Florentis, individuals; GPA,
Inc., a debtor Nevada corporation; Linde's Corporation, a
Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HUMANA, INC., a Delaware corporation; American Medicorp
Development Company; Clark County Sheriff's
Department, Civil Bureau; and Doe
Corporations 1 Through 9,
Inclusive,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-16629.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 1996.
Decided Nov. 19, 1996.
Before: NORRIS and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and WARDLAW,* District Judge.
JUDGMENT ORDER**
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in that court's orders.
Double costs are awarded to appellees.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In Re Gpa, Inc. D/B/A General Practice Associates, Debtor. Capital Management Consultants, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Alfred De Florentis, Audrey De Florentis, Individuals Gpa, Inc., a Debtor Nevada Corporation Linde's Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Humana, Inc., a Delaware Corporation American Medicorp Development Company Clark County Sheriff's Department, Civil Bureau and Doe Corporations 1 Through 9, Inclusive
- Status
- Unpublished