U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Colin Charles Rouse, AKA Charles Ryan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 7, 1996

103 F.3d 143; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35973; 1996 WL 671853 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

103 F.3d 143

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Colin Charles ROUSE, aka Charles Ryan, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-35153.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 5, 1996.*
Decided Nov. 7, 1996.

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Federal prisoner Colin Charles Rouse appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We review de novo, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir. 1994), and affirm.

Rouse's claims are foreclosed by United States v. McMullen, No. 95-36031, slip op. 14007 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 1996).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.