U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

Briseno v. City of Los Angeles

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 20, 1996

104 F.3d 365; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37757; 1996 WL 740832 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

104 F.3d 365

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Theodore J. BRISENO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Willie Williams, Chief of Police;
Darryl Gates; Val Panacia, Captain, individually & in his
official capacity; R.J. Martin, Captain, individually & in
his official capacity; F.X. Pegueros, Captain, individually
& in his official capacity; Corrie Malinka, Sergeant,
individually & in her official capacity; Harold Clifton,
Lt., individually & in his official capacity; and Rita
Knecht, Lt., individually & in her official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-56296.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 9, 1996.
Decided Dec. 20, 1996.

Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER*

The district court's order entered August 3, 1995 is affirmed for the reasons set forth therein.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.