U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Daniel Carmichael

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 7, 1996

105 F.3d 667; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38739; 1996 WL 756832 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

105 F.3d 667

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel CARMICHAEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-35643.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 5, 1996.*
Decided Nov. 7, 1996.

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Federal prisoner Daniel Carmichael appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He contends the district court erred when it denied him relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We review de novo, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir. 1994), and affirm.

Carmichael's claims are foreclosed by United States v. McMullen, No. 95-36031, slip op. 14007 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 1996).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, appellant's request for oral argument is denied

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.