McDaniel v. Appraisal Institute

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit September 16, 1997

McDaniel v. Appraisal Institute, 127 F.3d 1135 (9th Cir. 1997)

1997 WL 572248

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The concurring opinion, filed June 30, 1997 [117 F.3d 421], is amended as follows:

Delete the first full sentence on Slip Opinion page 7592 [117 F.3d at 424], starting with “The Institute ...” and replace it with: “The Institute only accepts between two and seven percent of its candidates, and MAI appraisers get over 90% of the commercial business in Southern Arizona.”

With the above amendment, the appellant’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The appellee’s petition for rehearing is also DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name: James C. McDANIEL v. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Illinois, fka American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Realtors Dan W. Mahoney, Husband Susan Mahoney Wife Sanders Solot, Husband Ruth-Jean Solot, Wife
Status: Published