Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1997

Spink v. Lockheed Corporation

Spink v. Lockheed Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 29, 1997
105 F.3d 1320; 97 Daily Journal DAR 1085; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 828; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1795 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Spink v. Lockheed Corporation

Opinion

105 F.3d 1320

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 828

Paul L. SPINK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOCKHEED CORPORATION; Daniel M. Tellep; Robert A. Furman;
Vincent N. Marafino; K.H. Anderson; L. Bernard; R.W.
Berry; P.N. Braun-Agel; D.L. Bronco; R.H. Northcutt;
W.E. Skowronski; A.G. Van Shaick; W.T. Vincent,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-56094.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 29, 1997.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV-92-0800-SWV.

Before D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 116 S.Ct. 1783, 60 F.3d 616

1

Plaintiff-Appellant's petition for rehearing, suggestion for rehearing en banc, and request for recall of mandate, received September 23, 1996, is ordered filed.

2

Plaintiff-Appellant's request for recall of mandate is GRANTED.

3

The defendants-appellees shall file a response to the plaintiff-appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. Said response shall not exceed fourteen (14) pages and shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date this order is filed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑