U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Osvaldo Ixquiac-Godinez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 13, 1997

108 F.3d 1387; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9244; 1997 WL 117118 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

108 F.3d 1387

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Osvaldo IXQUIAC-GODINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-50217.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 1997.*
Decided March 13, 1997.

Before: SNEED, LEAVY and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Osvaldo Ixquiac-Godinez appeals the district court's denial of his motion for discovery on the issue of selective prosecution and reinstatement of his conviction. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.