Jin Ching Indus., Inc. v. Wong's Intern. Trading Import
Jin Ching Indus., Inc. v. Wong's Intern. Trading Import
Opinion
113 F.3d 1241
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
JIN CHING INDUSTRIAL, INC., d/b/a Sansco, a California
corporation, Turtle King Corp., a California
corporation, Plaintiffs/Appellees,
v.
WONG'S INTERNATIONAL TRADING IMPORT a corporation, Export
Inc., Jimmy Wong, Defendants/Appellants.
No. 97-55014.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 22, 1997.*
Decided May 5, 1997.
Before: BROWNING, THOMPSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
This appeal from the grant of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
"A district court's order granting preliminary injunctive relief is subject to limited review: It will be reversed only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact." Triad Systems Corp. v. Southeastern Exp. Co., 64 F.3d 1330, 1334 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 1015 (1996).
The record before us shows that the district court did not abuse its discretion or base its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact. See id. Accordingly, the preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jin Ching Industrial, Inc., D/B/A Sansco, a California Corporation, Turtle King Corp., a California Corporation v. Wong's International Trading Import a Corporation, Export Inc., Jimmy Wong
- Status
- Unpublished