Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1997

Sharon Deforest v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company

Sharon Deforest v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 27, 1997
114 F.3d 1194; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18569; 1997 WL 285935 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Sharon Deforest v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company

Opinion

114 F.3d 1194

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Sharon DeFOREST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-15754.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 7, 1997.
Decided May 27, 1997.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, CHOY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court's well-reasoned memorandum decision and order.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑