Freestone v. Blessing
Freestone v. Blessing
Opinion
116 F.3d 412
Cathy FREESTONE, individually, on behalf of their minor
children and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Susan Harrington, individually, on behalf of their minor
children and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Sonya Madrid, individually, on behalf of their minor
children and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Judith Rogers, individually, on behalf of their minor
children and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Esperanza Laustaunau, individually, on behalf of their minor
children and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Linda J. BLESSING, Director, Arizona Department of Economic
Security,* Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-16697.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
June 20, 1997.
Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion, Blessing v. Freestone, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1353, 137 L.Ed.2d 569 (1997).
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c), Linda J. Blessing is substituted as defendant-appellee in place of her predecessor in office, Charles E. Cowan
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cathy Freestone, Individually, on Behalf of Their Minor Children and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Susan Harrington, Individually, on Behalf of Their Minor Children and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Sonya Madrid, Individually, on Behalf of Their Minor Children and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Judith Rogers, Individually, on Behalf of Their Minor Children and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Esperanza Laustaunau, Individually, on Behalf of Their Minor Children and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Linda J. Blessing, Director, Arizona Department of Economic Security
- Status
- Published