United States v. Raul Estrada-Becerra

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit June 5, 1997

United States v. Raul Estrada-Becerra, 116 F.3d 486 (9th Cir. 1997)

1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20339; 1997 WL 305887

Opinion

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Raul ESTRADA-BECERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-10320.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1997.**
Decided June 5, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-95-00632-RMB; Richard M. Bilby, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: NORRIS, LEAVY and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

In light of United States v. Fuentes-Barahona, 111 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1997), we vacate the sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2) and remand for resentencing.

VACATED and REMANDED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished