Forbes v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.
Forbes v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.
Opinion
119 F.3d 5
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ronald W. FORBES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of
the United States of America; Jack H. Nissen; Amsouth
Mortgage Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-15924.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 3, 1997.**
Decided July 14, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-95-01093-EJG/GGH; Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: NORRIS, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
This appeal is dismissed for lack of a final judgment because of the district court's failure to dispose of the supplemental claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Dannenburg v. Software Toolworks, Inc., 16 F.3d 1073, 1074 (9th Cir. 1994); see also 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f); Brockman v. Merabank, 40 F.3d 1013, 1015-17 (9th Cir. 1994).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ronald W. Forbes v. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, a Corporation Organized and Existing Under and by Virtue of the Laws of the United States of America Jack H. Nissen Amsouth Mortgage Corporation
- Status
- Unpublished