Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1997

Ronald Margolis and Carol Margolis v. Ellen M. Ryan, Sydney B. Strong, Lynn Dickerson, Catherine Danko Weikleenget, and Anita Stevenson

Ronald Margolis and Carol Margolis v. Ellen M. Ryan, Sydney B. Strong, Lynn Dickerson, Catherine Danko Weikleenget, and Anita Stevenson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 21, 1997
119 F.3d 6; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26072 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Ronald Margolis and Carol Margolis v. Ellen M. Ryan, Sydney B. Strong, Lynn Dickerson, Catherine Danko Weikleenget, and Anita Stevenson

Opinion

119 F.3d 6w

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2618

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ronald MARGOLIS and Carol Margolis, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Ellen M. RYAN, Sydney B. Strong, Lynn Dickerson, Catherine
Danko Weikleenget, and Anita Stevenson,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-35979, 95-36121.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued November 7, 1996.
Submitted November 7, 1996.
Decided July 21, 1997.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑