United States v. Ismael Torres-Ortiz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit July 18, 1997

United States v. Ismael Torres-Ortiz, 119 F.3d 8 (9th Cir. 1997)

1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26013; 1997 WL 406403

Opinion

119 F.3d 8

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ismael TORRES-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-50569.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 14, 1997**
Decided July 18, 1997.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Ismael Torres-Ortiz appeals the district court's denial of his motion for discovery on the issue of selective prosecution. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished