Bresnahan v. California Highway Patrol
Bresnahan v. California Highway Patrol
Opinion
122 F.3d 1069
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Daniel P. Bresnahan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL; California Association of
Highway Patrolmen; State Personnel Board; Robert
Rengstorff, Assistant Commissioner Field; Ronald Jones,
Officer; James Balducki, Sergeant; Michael Domino,
Sergeant; Wesley Bean, Sergeant; Clarence Tuck, Deputy
Chief; Gene Towle, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-55611.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted August 6, 1997 Pasadena, California
Aug. 27, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding
Before: HALL, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WINMILL,** District Judge.
ORDER*
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the orders of the district court filed on October 12, 1995; March 20, 1996; and April 2, 1996.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Daniel P. Bresnahan v. California Highway Patrol California Association of Highway Patrolmen State Personnel Board Robert Rengstorff, Assistant Commissioner Field Ronald Jones, Officer James Balducki, Sergeant Michael Domino, Sergeant Wesley Bean, Sergeant Clarence Tuck, Deputy Chief Gene Towle, Captain
- Status
- Unpublished