United States v. Jin Kim

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit September 12, 1997

United States v. Jin Kim, 124 F.3d 214 (9th Cir. 1997)

1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 31718; 1997 WL 584547

Opinion

124 F.3d 214

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jin KIM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-50693.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1997.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding

Before: HALL, BRUNETTI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Jin Kim appeals his conviction and sentence, after a guilty plea, for escape from the Federal Prison Camp at Boron, California, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished